Clean up Indian Railways: It must match its climate credentials with sound pollution and waste management

This article was originally published in The Times of India

Railways fascinate me. Professionally, I advocate for a massive expansion of rail networks to address the air pollution and climate crisis. Rail transport is not only highly energy efficient compared to road and air transport, it can also completely shift to renewable energy. It will, therefore, play a significant role in reducing emissions from the transport sector. The Indian Railways has recognised this potential and has set a target to achieve net zero carbon emission by 2030, the most ambitious climate target set in the country.

Personally, I love long train journeys. Travelling on the Coromandel Express from Howrah to Chennai, Netravati Express from Mangalore to Mumbai (when it ran on metre gauge), and the Rajdhani from Delhi to Mumbai and Kolkata are some of my favourite travel memories. But during all these times, like most people, I took for granted the noise, the open toilets (now stinking bio-toilets), and the waste along the tracks and stations. But as Indian Railways is expanding, modernising and privatising, environmental issues we overlooked in the past mustn’t be ignored anymore.

Indian Railways is big in every aspect; it runs the fourth largest railway system globally and carries 8 billion passengers and more than a billion tonnes of freight a year. These numbers are projected to increase by 50% over the next 10 years. As it’s already one of the largest consumers of water and energy and generator of waste, its environmental footprint will increase significantly in a business as usual scenario. While Indian Railways has made significant progress in energy efficiency, renewable energy and cleanliness, there are grave concerns of water and noise pollution and waste management.

Let’s first start with the law. For a long time, Railways had taken the view that the country’s key environmental laws – the Water, the Air, and the Hazardous Waste Act – do not apply to its operations. Therefore, no railway station took permits from the pollution control boards (PCBs) or complied with the regulations. A recent National Green Tribunal judgment has categorically rejected this stand and has directed the Railways to abide by the laws. However, the Railways is still reluctant to comply, and most stations are still operating without consent from PCBs.

The situation’s no different with railway sidings/ goods sheds, a major source of air pollution. The majority of these sidings are operated by private companies, but many are working without consent. Reports by the Comptroller and Auditor General and the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) have confirmed poor air pollution management at these establishments.

Poor handling of wastewater has also been identified as a significant concern by the CPCB. Since most stations have not installed Effluent Treatment Plants (ETPs), effluents generated from cleaning trains and stations are discharged into municipal drainages or low lying areas. The situation is the same with Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs).

Every day about 5,000-6,000 tonnes of fecal matter is generated from toilets in the trains and on stations. This is equivalent to the fecal waste generated in a large metro city. While 95% of trains have installed bio-toilets, they are “no better than septic tanks” and the water discharged no better than raw sewage. In the absence of STPs at most stations, the sewage is discharged untreated. In a country where hotels with more than 20 rooms are being directed to install STPs, Railways’ failure to install ETPs and STPs is discriminatory, so say the least.

Noise pollution is an even more problematic issue. More noise is considered useful in the railway establishment for accident prevention. There are strict instructions to honk at all gates, turns and at the time of entry and exit from a station. During the night, train drivers are instructed to honk to ensure they’re alert and not sleeping. Though accidents are a real problem because of encroachments and unfenced railway tracks, continuing with the current strategy is counterproductive because of enormous health implications.

High noise levels lead to poor learning, aggression, hypertension and cardiovascular disease. For millions of citizens living near railway stations and tracks, the railways’ current position is an untenable proposition. Indian Railways will have to find a solution that balances imperatives of accident prevention and noise control.

On waste management, Indian Railways has made some progress. It runs ‘Swachh Rail Abhiyan’ for improving cleanliness and waste management. While there’s no doubt that cleanliness has improved significantly, and some of our railway stations match global standards, the same cannot be said about solid waste.

Indian Railways seems to have an ‘out of sight, out of mind’ approach while dealing with solid wastes. Wastes are collected mainly in unsegregated form and disposed of along with the municipal wastes or burnt or dumped near the track. In fact, the Railways has not even enforced the single use plastic rules of various states, including the national ban on polythene bags. Overall, while Indian Railways is doing a lot on energy issues (because it also makes good economic sense), the same cannot be said about pollution or waste.

The fundamental problem seems to be a sense of ‘exceptionalism’. Railways have historically operated independently of the civil administration. It doesn’t follow many of the laws applicable to a similar service industry like the airline industry. It’s time these anomalies are corrected. Indian Railways should comply with environmental laws and work with civil authorities to solve pollution and waste issues. Its low energy footprint must be matched with sound environmental management.

+ posts

Chandra Bhushan is one of India’s foremost public policy experts and the founder-CEO of International Forum for Environment, Sustainability & Technology (iFOREST).

1 thought on “Clean up Indian Railways: It must match its climate credentials with sound pollution and waste management”

  1. 18-02-2021 Bangalore
    To Sri Chandra Bhushan CFO I.FOREST
    Sir,
    I read your article on” Clean Up Indian Railways”
    wherein you have stated that: “…While 95% of trains have installed bio-toilets,
    they are no better than (no better than) septic tanks and the water discharged
    is not better than raw sewage……”.
    In this connection I have designed and fabricated a tank using locally avaiable
    technology. This tank is for SYSTEMATIC COLLECTION, SYSTEMATIC RETENTION
    AND SYSTEMATIC DISPOSAL OF LIQUID WASTER AT CERTAIN DESIGNATED PLACES
    WITHOUT STOPPING THE TRAIN. The entire operation lasts for fifteen seconds only. All the toils become clean simultaneously in 015 seconds (15 seconds).
    I have provisional patent issued by Patent Office, Chennai.
    I have participated in exhibition conducted by Vishweshwaraiah Ind.& Tec.Muserum in Bangalore.
    I wrote to DRDO (Railways) and Ministry of Railways to look into my invention and adopt it. But they refused. Reason given by them: Only invention improving
    the so called bio toilets only are acceptable to them.
    But my invention is far far better them their bio toilets.
    Since you are CEO of I.FOREST, can you be pro active and take up my invention
    to railways? My invention uses locally available materials and simple technology.
    My invention creates full time employment to around 5,000 employees at least.
    Discharge of liquid waster at designated places can increase ground water level,
    makes available free manure for piggery and any other similar purposes.
    Provisional Patent Np.5079/CHE/2013 dated 11-11-2013 Patent Office Chennai India.
    One letter from RDSO Railway Ministry New Delhi Letter No.MC/CB/LF/Anaerobic
    dated 05-06-2017- wherein Railways declined to implement my invention.

    Sir, Can you see the purpose of my invention and rise to my request and
    see that my invention meant for railways sees the light.??
    Kindly furnish your postal address of your office I.FOTEST.
    If you are in Bangalore kindly send your postal address. I will meet you in
    person and discuss about my invention along with Patent details.

    Invention is my passion. I always aim at perfection.

    Nagaraj T V 64 years. Retired SBI Manager residing in Bangalore.
    My income tax No. ABTPN5713D. My P.F.No.1883070 in State Bank of India.

    With regards, Have a good day, Sir. Kindly respond to me by e-mail only.

    – Nagaraj T V Bangalore

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

Scroll to Top